How do they justify ignoring one person's complaints of harrassment, but paying attention to those of another person? I can see that they might pick favourites etc, but surely at some point they have to justify what they do?
The immmature lady S digits when I defended Carol decided to launch a PM attack on me, then when I told her it was her own silly fault and it should teach her not to meddle in other people's quarrels I got another diatribe.
I try to avoid her normally. I got fed up enough about her melodramatic response to having a brother who was a member of the military who was actually seeing action. Surely that happens... or at least it does to practically every other military personnel I know at present.
Actually S15 was just a side issue - unlucky enough to be dragged into it by SF in his quest for allies... I apologised to her many times for getting her involved but she was ungraicious enough not to accept and wishes to report my PMs which were just a teensy bit rude So it's interesting to know she didn't hesitate to send less than polite ones to jod...
Oh and CD - the lead-up was mainly by email, PM, text, phone, you name it - and has been going on for 6 months plus... Forum posts would just be a sly reference to something that only I would pick up on
I guess that's why the mods found it so tricky - but the times when he literally posted after my every single post within 2 or 3 mins, I'm sure somthing could have been done about that...
What I want to know is why a number of posters deregistered themselves from TOP, unfortunately, one of them has subequently deregistered themsevles from here too, so its a bit difficult to ask.
BTW. for those who think I'm some kind of double agent, I'm not. I am who I am... I think that's how the song goes and I don't give a d a m what people think. Apparently being an individual is cool, so I'll stick with that and be honest to myself.